How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Brazil?

28 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Armenia vs Brazil: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Armenia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Brazil

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Armenia rank

21st

Brazil rank

18th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Armenia
Brazil

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Armenia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 21st and Brazil ranks 18th of 122 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Armenia	Brazil	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Armenia
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Armenia
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Armenia
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Armenia or Brazil?: Brazil, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Armenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Armenia and Brazil?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Brazil?: 28 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2024.
How do Armenia and Brazil rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Armenia ranks 21st and Brazil ranks 18th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Brazil: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/armenia/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/armenia/brazil/">Armenia vs Brazil: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.