How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Nepal?

30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Argentina vs Nepal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Argentina

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Nepal

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 1990

Argentina rank

8th

Nepal rank

6th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Argentina
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Argentina, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 8th and Nepal ranks 6th of 122 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Argentina	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0006 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0005 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Argentina
1970s	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Argentina
1980s	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Argentina
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Argentina or Nepal?: Nepal, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Argentina as of 1990.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Argentina and Nepal?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Nepal?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Argentina and Nepal rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Argentina ranks 8th and Nepal ranks 6th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Nepal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/argentina/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/argentina/nepal/">Argentina vs Nepal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.