How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Namibia?

45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Algeria vs Namibia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Algeria

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Namibia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Algeria rank

41st

Namibia rank

40th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Algeria
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Algeria, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Namibia ahead.

Algeria ranks 41st and Namibia ranks 40th of 122 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Algeria	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Namibia
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Namibia
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Namibia
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Algeria
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Algeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Algeria or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Algeria as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Algeria and Namibia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Namibia?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Algeria and Namibia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Algeria ranks 41st and Namibia ranks 40th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Algeria vs Namibia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/algeria/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/algeria/namibia/">Algeria vs Namibia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.