How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Kazakhstan?

31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Albania vs Kazakhstan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Albania

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Kazakhstan

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Albania rank

37th

Kazakhstan rank

36th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Albania
Kazakhstan

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Albania, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Albania ranks 37th and Kazakhstan ranks 36th of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Albania	Kazakhstan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Kazakhstan
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Albania
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Albania
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Albania or Kazakhstan?: Kazakhstan, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Albania as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Albania and Kazakhstan?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Kazakhstan?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Albania and Kazakhstan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Albania ranks 37th and Kazakhstan ranks 36th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Kazakhstan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/albania/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/albania/kazakhstan/">Albania vs Kazakhstan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.