How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Palestine?

29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Tunisia vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Tunisia

0.0119 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Palestine

0.0122 1000 USD per person

in 2022

Tunisia rank

76th

Palestine rank

75th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Tunisia
Palestine

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.0122 1000 USD per person against 0.0119 1000 USD per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0003 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Tunisia ahead.

Tunisia ranks 76th and Palestine ranks 75th of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 3 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Tunisia	Palestine	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.018 1000 USD per person	0.0041 1000 USD per person	0.0139 1000 USD per person	Tunisia
2000s	0.0184 1000 USD per person	0.004 1000 USD per person	0.0144 1000 USD per person	Tunisia
2010s	0.0171 1000 USD per person	0.0065 1000 USD per person	0.0106 1000 USD per person	Tunisia
2020s	0.0147 1000 USD per person	0.0152 1000 USD per person	0.0005 1000 USD per person	Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Tunisia or Palestine?: Palestine, at 0.0122 1000 USD per person against 0.0119 1000 USD per person in Tunisia as of 2022.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Tunisia and Palestine?: 0.0003 1000 USD per person, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Palestine?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Tunisia and Palestine rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Tunisia ranks 76th and Palestine ranks 75th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/tunisia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/tunisia/west-bank-and-gaza/">Tunisia vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.