How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Palestine?

29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Pakistan vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Pakistan

0.0128 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Palestine

0.0122 1000 USD per person

in 2022

Pakistan rank

73rd

Palestine rank

75th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Pakistan
Palestine

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.0128 1000 USD per person against 0.0122 1000 USD per person in Palestine, a difference of 0.0006 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 73rd and Palestine ranks 75th of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 3 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Pakistan	Palestine	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0062 1000 USD per person	0.0041 1000 USD per person	0.0021 1000 USD per person	Pakistan
2000s	0.0071 1000 USD per person	0.004 1000 USD per person	0.0031 1000 USD per person	Pakistan
2010s	0.0112 1000 USD per person	0.0065 1000 USD per person	0.0047 1000 USD per person	Pakistan
2020s	0.011 1000 USD per person	0.0152 1000 USD per person	0.0042 1000 USD per person	Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Pakistan or Palestine?: Pakistan, at 0.0128 1000 USD per person against 0.0122 1000 USD per person in Palestine as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Pakistan and Palestine?: 0.0006 1000 USD per person, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Palestine?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Pakistan and Palestine rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Pakistan ranks 73rd and Palestine ranks 75th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/pakistan/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/pakistan/west-bank-and-gaza/">Pakistan vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.