Mauritius vs Singapore: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Mauritius
0 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Singapore
0.0001 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Mauritius rank
121st
Singapore rank
120th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Mauritius
  • Singapore
00.0050.010.015196119922024

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.0001 1000 USD per person against 0 1000 USD per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0001 1000 USD per person.

That makes Singapore's figure about 43.6 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 121st and Singapore ranks 120th of 122 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Singapore in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0085 1000 USD per person 0.0025 1000 USD per person 0.0059 1000 USD per person Mauritius
1970s 0.0062 1000 USD per person 0.001 1000 USD per person 0.0051 1000 USD per person Mauritius
1980s 0.0053 1000 USD per person 0.0002 1000 USD per person 0.0051 1000 USD per person Mauritius
1990s 0.0029 1000 USD per person 0.0001 1000 USD per person 0.0028 1000 USD per person Mauritius
2000s 0.0012 1000 USD per person 0.0001 1000 USD per person 0.0011 1000 USD per person Mauritius
2010s 0.0006 1000 USD per person 0.0001 1000 USD per person 0.0005 1000 USD per person Mauritius
2020s 0 1000 USD per person 0.0001 1000 USD per person 0.0001 1000 USD per person Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Mauritius or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.0001 1000 USD per person against 0 1000 USD per person in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Mauritius and Singapore?
0.0001 1000 USD per person, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Singapore?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Singapore rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Mauritius ranks 121st and Singapore ranks 120th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Singapore: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/mauritius/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/mauritius/singapore/">Mauritius vs Singapore: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.