How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Niger?

57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Niger: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Malta

0.0079 1000 USD per person

in 2017

Niger

0.0077 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Malta rank

89th

Niger rank

91st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Malta
Niger

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0079 1000 USD per person against 0.0077 1000 USD per person in Niger, a difference of 0.0002 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Niger ahead.

Malta ranks 89th and Niger ranks 91st of 122 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Niger	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.007 1000 USD per person	0.021 1000 USD per person	0.0139 1000 USD per person	Niger
1970s	0.0114 1000 USD per person	0.0198 1000 USD per person	0.0084 1000 USD per person	Niger
1980s	0.0136 1000 USD per person	0.0238 1000 USD per person	0.0102 1000 USD per person	Niger
1990s	0.0142 1000 USD per person	0.0255 1000 USD per person	0.0113 1000 USD per person	Niger
2000s	0.012 1000 USD per person	0.0121 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	Niger
2010s	0.0087 1000 USD per person	0.0095 1000 USD per person	0.0008 1000 USD per person	Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Malta or Niger?: Malta, at 0.0079 1000 USD per person against 0.0077 1000 USD per person in Niger as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Malta and Niger?: 0.0002 1000 USD per person, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Niger?: 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Malta and Niger rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Malta ranks 89th and Niger ranks 91st of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Niger: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/malta/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/malta/niger/">Malta vs Niger: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.