How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?

26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Namibia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Latvia

0.0182 1000 USD per person

in 2017

Namibia

0.0189 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Latvia rank

60th

Namibia rank

59th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Latvia
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0189 1000 USD per person against 0.0182 1000 USD per person in Latvia, a difference of 0.0007 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 59th of 122 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0415 1000 USD per person	0.0441 1000 USD per person	0.0025 1000 USD per person	Namibia
2000s	0.017 1000 USD per person	0.0374 1000 USD per person	0.0204 1000 USD per person	Namibia
2010s	0.0173 1000 USD per person	0.0248 1000 USD per person	0.0076 1000 USD per person	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Latvia or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0.0189 1000 USD per person against 0.0182 1000 USD per person in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Latvia and Namibia?: 0.0007 1000 USD per person, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Latvia ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 59th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Namibia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/latvia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/latvia/namibia/">Latvia vs Namibia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.