How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mongolia?

31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kazakhstan vs Mongolia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Kazakhstan

0.0729 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Mongolia

0.0717 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Kazakhstan rank

21st

Mongolia rank

23rd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Kazakhstan
Mongolia

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0729 1000 USD per person against 0.0717 1000 USD per person in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0012 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kazakhstan	Mongolia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0976 1000 USD per person	0.0883 1000 USD per person	0.0093 1000 USD per person	Kazakhstan
2000s	0.0748 1000 USD per person	0.0549 1000 USD per person	0.0199 1000 USD per person	Kazakhstan
2010s	0.0828 1000 USD per person	0.0615 1000 USD per person	0.0212 1000 USD per person	Kazakhstan
2020s	0.0694 1000 USD per person	0.0911 1000 USD per person	0.0218 1000 USD per person	Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Kazakhstan or Mongolia?: Kazakhstan, at 0.0729 1000 USD per person against 0.0717 1000 USD per person in Mongolia as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Kazakhstan and Mongolia?: 0.0012 1000 USD per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mongolia?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Kazakhstan and Mongolia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Kazakhstan ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Mongolia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/kazakhstan/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/kazakhstan/mongolia/">Kazakhstan vs Mongolia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.