Jamaica vs Saudi Arabia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Jamaica
0.0017 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
0.0024 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Jamaica rank
113th
Saudi Arabia rank
110th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Jamaica
  • Saudi Arabia
00.0050.010.015196119922024

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.0024 1000 USD per person against 0.0017 1000 USD per person in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0007 1000 USD per person.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.4 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Jamaica ranks 113th and Saudi Arabia ranks 110th of 122 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0042 1000 USD per person 0.0055 1000 USD per person 0.0013 1000 USD per person Saudi Arabia
1970s 0.0037 1000 USD per person 0.0043 1000 USD per person 0.0006 1000 USD per person Saudi Arabia
1980s 0.0038 1000 USD per person 0.0067 1000 USD per person 0.0029 1000 USD per person Saudi Arabia
1990s 0.0041 1000 USD per person 0.0093 1000 USD per person 0.0052 1000 USD per person Saudi Arabia
2000s 0.0024 1000 USD per person 0.005 1000 USD per person 0.0026 1000 USD per person Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.0013 1000 USD per person 0.0071 1000 USD per person 0.0058 1000 USD per person Saudi Arabia
2020s 0.0016 1000 USD per person 0.0019 1000 USD per person 0.0003 1000 USD per person Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Jamaica or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0.0024 1000 USD per person against 0.0017 1000 USD per person in Jamaica as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Jamaica and Saudi Arabia?
0.0007 1000 USD per person, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Saudi Arabia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Jamaica and Saudi Arabia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Jamaica ranks 113th and Saudi Arabia ranks 110th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Saudi Arabia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/jamaica/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/jamaica/saudi-arabia/">Jamaica vs Saudi Arabia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.