How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Guinea?

32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ethiopia vs Guinea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Ethiopia

0.0145 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Guinea

0.0172 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Ethiopia rank

64th

Guinea rank

62nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Ethiopia
Guinea

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 0.0172 1000 USD per person against 0.0145 1000 USD per person in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.0027 1000 USD per person.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ethiopia ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 64th and Guinea ranks 62nd of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ethiopia	Guinea	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0195 1000 USD per person	0.0125 1000 USD per person	0.007 1000 USD per person	Ethiopia
2000s	0.02 1000 USD per person	0.0153 1000 USD per person	0.0047 1000 USD per person	Ethiopia
2010s	0.017 1000 USD per person	0.0231 1000 USD per person	0.0061 1000 USD per person	Guinea
2020s	0.0152 1000 USD per person	0.0176 1000 USD per person	0.0025 1000 USD per person	Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Ethiopia or Guinea?: Guinea, at 0.0172 1000 USD per person against 0.0145 1000 USD per person in Ethiopia as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Ethiopia and Guinea?: 0.0027 1000 USD per person, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Guinea?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Ethiopia and Guinea rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Ethiopia ranks 64th and Guinea ranks 62nd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Guinea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/ethiopia/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/ethiopia/guinea/">Ethiopia vs Guinea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.