Equatorial Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Equatorial Guinea
0.0003 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0.0015 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
118th
Sri Lanka rank
115th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sri Lanka
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196119922024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0015 1000 USD per person against 0.0003 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0012 1000 USD per person.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 4.4 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 118th and Sri Lanka ranks 115th of 122 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0011 1000 USD per person 0.0043 1000 USD per person 0.0032 1000 USD per person Sri Lanka
1970s 0.0014 1000 USD per person 0.0036 1000 USD per person 0.0022 1000 USD per person Sri Lanka
1980s 0.0014 1000 USD per person 0.0025 1000 USD per person 0.0011 1000 USD per person Sri Lanka
1990s 0.001 1000 USD per person 0.0022 1000 USD per person 0.0012 1000 USD per person Sri Lanka
2000s 0.0007 1000 USD per person 0.0021 1000 USD per person 0.0014 1000 USD per person Sri Lanka
2010s 0.0002 1000 USD per person 0.0017 1000 USD per person 0.0015 1000 USD per person Sri Lanka
2020s 0.0003 1000 USD per person 0.0014 1000 USD per person 0.0012 1000 USD per person Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Equatorial Guinea or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.0015 1000 USD per person against 0.0003 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
0.0012 1000 USD per person, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 118th and Sri Lanka ranks 115th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/equatorial-guinea/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/equatorial-guinea/sri-lanka/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.