How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sweden?

57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

China

0.0342 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Sweden

0.0352 1000 USD per person

in 2017

China rank

47th

Sweden rank

46th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

China
Sweden

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0352 1000 USD per person against 0.0342 1000 USD per person in China, a difference of 0.001 1000 USD per person.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

China ranks 47th and Sweden ranks 46th of 122 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Sweden	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0009 1000 USD per person	0.0538 1000 USD per person	0.0529 1000 USD per person	Sweden
1970s	0.0013 1000 USD per person	0.0472 1000 USD per person	0.0459 1000 USD per person	Sweden
1980s	0.0028 1000 USD per person	0.048 1000 USD per person	0.0452 1000 USD per person	Sweden
1990s	0.0146 1000 USD per person	0.0426 1000 USD per person	0.028 1000 USD per person	Sweden
2000s	0.027 1000 USD per person	0.0415 1000 USD per person	0.0145 1000 USD per person	Sweden
2010s	0.0279 1000 USD per person	0.0369 1000 USD per person	0.009 1000 USD per person	Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, China or Sweden?: Sweden, at 0.0352 1000 USD per person against 0.0342 1000 USD per person in China as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between China and Sweden?: 0.001 1000 USD per person, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sweden?: 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do China and Sweden rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: China ranks 47th and Sweden ranks 46th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/china/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/china/sweden/">China vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.