Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mozambique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.004 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Mozambique
0.0025 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
106th
Mozambique rank
109th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Mozambique
00.0050.010.015196119922024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.004 1000 USD per person against 0.0025 1000 USD per person in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0015 1000 USD per person.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.6 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mozambique ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 106th and Mozambique ranks 109th of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0023 1000 USD per person 0.003 1000 USD per person 0.0007 1000 USD per person Mozambique
2000s 0.0047 1000 USD per person 0.0014 1000 USD per person 0.0032 1000 USD per person Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 0.0073 1000 USD per person 0.0018 1000 USD per person 0.0055 1000 USD per person Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.0044 1000 USD per person 0.0023 1000 USD per person 0.002 1000 USD per person Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Mozambique?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.004 1000 USD per person against 0.0025 1000 USD per person in Mozambique as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mozambique?
0.0015 1000 USD per person, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mozambique?
29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mozambique rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 106th and Mozambique ranks 109th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mozambique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mozambique/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mozambique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.