How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belgium?

18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Austria vs Belgium: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Austria

0.1139 1000 USD per person

in 2017

Belgium

0.1428 1000 USD per person

in 2017

Austria rank

10th

Belgium rank

9th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Austria
Belgium

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0.1428 1000 USD per person against 0.1139 1000 USD per person in Austria, a difference of 0.0289 1000 USD per person.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.3 times Austria's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 10th and Belgium ranks 9th of 122 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Austria	Belgium	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.115 1000 USD per person	0.1605 1000 USD per person	0.0455 1000 USD per person	Belgium
2010s	0.1168 1000 USD per person	0.1384 1000 USD per person	0.0216 1000 USD per person	Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Austria or Belgium?: Belgium, at 0.1428 1000 USD per person against 0.1139 1000 USD per person in Austria as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Austria and Belgium?: 0.0289 1000 USD per person, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belgium?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
How do Austria and Belgium rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Austria ranks 10th and Belgium ranks 9th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Belgium: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/austria/belgium/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/austria/belgium/">Austria vs Belgium: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.