How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Lithuania?

26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Algeria vs Lithuania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Algeria

0.0232 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Lithuania

0.0308 1000 USD per person

in 2017

Algeria rank

52nd

Lithuania rank

50th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Algeria
Lithuania

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.0308 1000 USD per person against 0.0232 1000 USD per person in Algeria, a difference of 0.0076 1000 USD per person.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.3 times Algeria's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Algeria ranks 52nd and Lithuania ranks 50th of 122 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Algeria	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0287 1000 USD per person	0.0663 1000 USD per person	0.0376 1000 USD per person	Lithuania
2000s	0.0297 1000 USD per person	0.0317 1000 USD per person	0.0021 1000 USD per person	Lithuania
2010s	0.0272 1000 USD per person	0.0296 1000 USD per person	0.0024 1000 USD per person	Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Algeria or Lithuania?: Lithuania, at 0.0308 1000 USD per person against 0.0232 1000 USD per person in Algeria as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Algeria and Lithuania?: 0.0076 1000 USD per person, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Lithuania?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Algeria and Lithuania rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Algeria ranks 52nd and Lithuania ranks 50th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Algeria vs Lithuania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/algeria/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-8/algeria/lithuania/">Algeria vs Lithuania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,765 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.