How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?

12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Sudan

1.61 % change on previous year

in 2024

Zimbabwe

1.54 % change on previous year

in 2024

Sudan rank

64th

Zimbabwe rank

67th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Sudan
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 1.61 % change on previous year against 1.54 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.07 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Sudan ahead.

Sudan ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 209 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sudan	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2010s	1.37 % change on previous year	-0.9663 % change on previous year	2.33 % change on previous year	Sudan
2020s	-1.14 % change on previous year	3.79 % change on previous year	4.94 % change on previous year	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Sudan or Zimbabwe?: Sudan, at 1.61 % change on previous year against 1.54 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Sudan and Zimbabwe?: 0.07 % change on previous year, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Sudan ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/sudan/zimbabwe/">Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 239 places, 13,206 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed: 28 September 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.