South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

South Sudan
1.29 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
1.54 % change on previous year
in 2024
South Sudan rank
70th
Zimbabwe rank
67th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • South Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600196219932024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.54 % change on previous year against 1.29 % change on previous year in South Sudan, a difference of 0.25 % change on previous year.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was South Sudan ahead.

South Sudan ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 209 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 7.59 % change on previous year -0.9663 % change on previous year 8.56 % change on previous year South Sudan
2020s -1.44 % change on previous year 3.79 % change on previous year 5.23 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.54 % change on previous year against 1.29 % change on previous year in South Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
0.25 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
South Sudan ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/south-sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/south-sudan/zimbabwe/">South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,206 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.