Norway vs Romania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Norway
-4.93 % change on previous year
in 2024
Romania
-4.46 % change on previous year
in 2017
Norway rank
156th
Romania rank
154th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Norway
  • Romania
-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Romania currently reports -4.46 % change on previous year against -4.93 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0.47 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 29 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Romania ahead.

Norway ranks 156th and Romania ranks 154th of 209 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 1.2 % change on previous year 5.14 % change on previous year 3.94 % change on previous year Romania
1970s 2.18 % change on previous year 3.85 % change on previous year 1.68 % change on previous year Romania
1980s 0.6419 % change on previous year -3.09 % change on previous year 3.74 % change on previous year Norway
1990s 3.28 % change on previous year -0.0713 % change on previous year 3.35 % change on previous year Norway
2000s -1.13 % change on previous year 0.8434 % change on previous year 1.98 % change on previous year Romania
2010s 0.1487 % change on previous year -3.53 % change on previous year 3.68 % change on previous year Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Norway or Romania?
Romania, at -4.46 % change on previous year against -4.93 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Norway and Romania?
0.47 % change on previous year, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Romania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
How do Norway and Romania rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Norway ranks 156th and Romania ranks 154th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Romania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/norway/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/norway/romania/">Norway vs Romania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,206 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.