China, Hong Kong SAR vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 7.31 % change on previous year against 6.99 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.32 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 21 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 32nd and Rwanda ranks 29th of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.59 % change on previous year | 6.17 % change on previous year | 2.58 % change on previous year | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 0 % change on previous year | 6.35 % change on previous year | 6.35 % change on previous year | Rwanda |
| 1980s | -52.91 % change on previous year | 1.77 % change on previous year | 54.68 % change on previous year | Rwanda |
| 1990s | -5.9 % change on previous year | 3.09 % change on previous year | 8.98 % change on previous year | Rwanda |
| 2000s | -49.19 % change on previous year | 8.68 % change on previous year | 57.87 % change on previous year | Rwanda |
| 2010s | -12.28 % change on previous year | 3.37 % change on previous year | 15.65 % change on previous year | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 11.18 % change on previous year | 3.52 % change on previous year | 7.66 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, China, Hong Kong SAR or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 7.31 % change on previous year against 6.99 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between China, Hong Kong SAR and Rwanda?
- 0.32 % change on previous year, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Rwanda?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Rwanda rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 32nd and Rwanda ranks 29th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.