How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Rwanda?

17 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Belgium

7.66 % change on previous year

in 2017

Rwanda

7.31 % change on previous year

in 2024

Belgium rank

26th

Rwanda rank

29th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Belgium
Rwanda

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 7.66 % change on previous year against 7.31 % change on previous year in Rwanda, a difference of 0.35 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Rwanda ahead.

Belgium ranks 26th and Rwanda ranks 29th of 209 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
2000s	-0.3842 % change on previous year	8.77 % change on previous year	9.15 % change on previous year	Rwanda
2010s	0.5992 % change on previous year	-1.51 % change on previous year	2.11 % change on previous year	Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Belgium or Rwanda?: Belgium, at 7.66 % change on previous year against 7.31 % change on previous year in Rwanda as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Belgium and Rwanda?: 0.35 % change on previous year, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Rwanda?: 17 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2017.
How do Belgium and Rwanda rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Belgium ranks 26th and Rwanda ranks 29th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/belgium/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/belgium/rwanda/">Belgium vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 239 places, 13,206 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed: 28 September 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.