Belgium-Luxembourg vs Japan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Belgium-Luxembourg
-7.32 % change on previous year
in 1999
Japan
-7.91 % change on previous year
in 2024
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
176th
Japan rank
178th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • Japan
-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports -7.32 % change on previous year against -7.91 % change on previous year in Japan, a difference of 0.59 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 176th and Japan ranks 178th of 209 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 1.8 % change on previous year 8.47 % change on previous year 6.67 % change on previous year Japan
1970s 2.36 % change on previous year 6.5 % change on previous year 4.13 % change on previous year Japan
1980s 1.08 % change on previous year 3.09 % change on previous year 2 % change on previous year Japan
1990s -0.5169 % change on previous year 0.1118 % change on previous year 0.6286 % change on previous year Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Belgium-Luxembourg or Japan?
Belgium-Luxembourg, at -7.32 % change on previous year against -7.91 % change on previous year in Japan as of 1999.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Belgium-Luxembourg and Japan?
0.59 % change on previous year, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Japan?
38 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1999.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Japan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 176th and Japan ranks 178th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs Japan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/belgium-luxembourg/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-7/belgium-luxembourg/japan/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs Japan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,206 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.