Australia vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time
- Australia
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Australia currently reports 15.88 % change on previous year against 2.4 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 13.48 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia's figure about 6.6 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 28 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 11th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.28 % change on previous year | 2.93 % change on previous year | 2.35 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 1970s | 8.46 % change on previous year | 2.31 % change on previous year | 6.15 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 1980s | -2.49 % change on previous year | 1.4 % change on previous year | 3.9 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 3.12 % change on previous year | 5.57 % change on previous year | 2.45 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 0.5165 % change on previous year | 1 % change on previous year | 0.4853 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 1.76 % change on previous year | 4.38 % change on previous year | 2.62 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 2.09 % change on previous year | 1.99 % change on previous year | 0.1007 % change on previous year | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Australia or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Australia, at 15.88 % change on previous year against 2.4 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 13.48 % change on previous year, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Australia ranks 11th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.