South Sudan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

South Sudan
0.8891 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.8493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan rank
109th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
110th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • South Sudan
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0.50.7511.21.51.8196119922023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 0.8891 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.8493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0398 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

South Sudan ranks 109th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 110th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2010s 0.7368 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8388 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.8824 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0434 1000 Int$ per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, South Sudan or Trinidad and Tobago?
South Sudan, at 0.8891 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.8493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between South Sudan and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0398 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Trinidad and Tobago?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do South Sudan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
South Sudan ranks 109th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 110th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/south-sudan/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/south-sudan/trinidad-and-tobago/">South Sudan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.