South Sudan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

South Sudan
0.8891 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.7962 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan rank
109th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
112th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • South Sudan
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 0.8891 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7962 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0929 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

South Sudan ranks 109th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 112th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2010s 0.7368 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.8824 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7433 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1391 1000 Int$ per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, South Sudan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
South Sudan, at 0.8891 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7962 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between South Sudan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0929 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do South Sudan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
South Sudan ranks 109th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 112th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/south-sudan/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/south-sudan/st-kitts-and-nevis/">South Sudan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.