Jordan vs Samoa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Jordan
2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
66th
Samoa rank
67th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Jordan
  • Samoa
0123196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Samoa ahead.

Jordan ranks 66th and Samoa ranks 67th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0556 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7454 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1970s 0.068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6783 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1980s 0.0454 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9977 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9523 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 0.0447 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2000s 0.252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 0.6725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 2.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Jordan or Samoa?
Jordan, at 2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Jordan and Samoa?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Samoa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Samoa rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Jordan ranks 66th and Samoa ranks 67th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Samoa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/jordan/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/jordan/samoa/">Jordan vs Samoa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.