Hungary vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Hungary
1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Sweden
1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Hungary rank
86th
Sweden rank
83rd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Hungary
  • Sweden
2468196119892017

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 86th and Sweden ranks 83rd of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 5 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 5.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 6.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 6.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 1.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4663 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1567 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Hungary or Sweden?
Sweden, at 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Hungary and Sweden?
0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sweden?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Hungary and Sweden rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Hungary ranks 86th and Sweden ranks 83rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/hungary/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/hungary/sweden/">Hungary vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.