Hungary vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Hungary
1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Sri Lanka
1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
86th
Sri Lanka rank
85th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Hungary
  • Sri Lanka
2468196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 86th and Sri Lanka ranks 85th of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 5.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 6.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 6.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 1.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Hungary or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Hungary and Sri Lanka?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sri Lanka?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Hungary and Sri Lanka rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Hungary ranks 86th and Sri Lanka ranks 85th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/hungary/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/hungary/sri-lanka/">Hungary vs Sri Lanka: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.