Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Guinea-Bissau
1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 1990
Guinea-Bissau rank
92nd
Nepal rank
94th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Nepal
0.20.40.60.811.2196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 92nd and Nepal ranks 94th of 167 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2783 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7854 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5071 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 0.311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7224 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 0.3952 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 0.505 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6913 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Guinea-Bissau or Nepal?
Guinea-Bissau, at 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?
30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Nepal rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 92nd and Nepal ranks 94th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/guinea-bissau/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/guinea-bissau/nepal/">Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.