Georgia vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Georgia
1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
82nd
Zambia rank
84th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Georgia
  • Zambia
0123196119922023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 82nd and Zambia ranks 84th of 167 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 2.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4344 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3351 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Georgia or Zambia?
Georgia, at 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Georgia and Zambia?
0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zambia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Zambia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Georgia ranks 82nd and Zambia ranks 84th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/georgia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/georgia/zambia/">Georgia vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.