Georgia vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Georgia
1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Georgia rank
82nd
Sweden rank
83rd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Georgia
  • Sweden
11.522.533.5196119922023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 82nd and Sweden ranks 83rd of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 2.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0567 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Georgia or Sweden?
Georgia, at 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Georgia and Sweden?
0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Sweden?
24 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2017.
How do Georgia and Sweden rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Georgia ranks 82nd and Sweden ranks 83rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/georgia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/georgia/sweden/">Georgia vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.