Finland vs Guinea-Bissau: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Finland
1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Guinea-Bissau
1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
90th
Guinea-Bissau rank
92nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Finland
  • Guinea-Bissau
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 90th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 92nd of 167 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2783 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9881 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
1970s 1.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
1980s 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3952 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
1990s 1.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1719 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Finland or Guinea-Bissau?
Finland, at 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Finland and Guinea-Bissau?
0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Guinea-Bissau?
50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Finland and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Finland ranks 90th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 92nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Guinea-Bissau: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/finland/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/finland/guinea-bissau/">Finland vs Guinea-Bissau: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.