Estonia vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Estonia
1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Finland
1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Estonia rank
93rd
Finland rank
90th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Estonia
  • Finland
12345196119892017

How they compare

Finland currently reports 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 93rd and Finland ranks 90th of 167 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Finland Difference Ahead
1990s 2.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0384 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Estonia or Finland?
Finland, at 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Estonia and Finland?
0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Finland?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Estonia and Finland rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Estonia ranks 93rd and Finland ranks 90th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/estonia/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/estonia/finland/">Estonia vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.