Egypt vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Egypt
1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Egypt rank
87th
Latvia rank
88th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Egypt
  • Latvia
02468196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Egypt ranks 87th and Latvia ranks 88th of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 1.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Egypt or Latvia?
Egypt, at 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Egypt and Latvia?
0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Latvia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Egypt and Latvia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Egypt ranks 87th and Latvia ranks 88th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/egypt-arab-rep/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/egypt-arab-rep/latvia/">Egypt vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.