Cyprus vs Morocco: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Cyprus
2.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Morocco
2.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
61st
Morocco rank
62nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Cyprus
  • Morocco
0.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 2.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 0.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 61st and Morocco ranks 62nd of 167 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4599 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1970s 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.864 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1980s 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2198 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1990s 2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8616 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 1.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.378 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 2.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Cyprus or Morocco?
Cyprus, at 2.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Cyprus and Morocco?
0.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Morocco?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Cyprus and Morocco rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Cyprus ranks 61st and Morocco ranks 62nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Morocco: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/cyprus/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/cyprus/morocco/">Cyprus vs Morocco: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.