Costa Rica vs Poland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Costa Rica
7.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
7.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Costa Rica rank
23rd
Poland rank
21st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Poland
246810196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 7.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 23rd and Poland ranks 21st of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Poland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1970s 5.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1980s 6.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1990s 7.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.397 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 6.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 7.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9282 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Costa Rica or Poland?
Poland, at 7.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Costa Rica and Poland?
0.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Poland?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Costa Rica and Poland rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Costa Rica ranks 23rd and Poland ranks 21st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Poland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/costa-rica/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/costa-rica/poland/">Costa Rica vs Poland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.