Chile vs Fiji: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Chile
1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Fiji
1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
99th
Fiji rank
101st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Chile
  • Fiji
0.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Fiji, a difference of 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.

Chile ranks 99th and Fiji ranks 101st of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Fiji in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Fiji Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7997 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0875 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
1970s 0.8629 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
1980s 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
1990s 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8222 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5658 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5353 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7317 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6387 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5669 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 1.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8702 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Chile or Fiji?
Chile, at 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Fiji as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Chile and Fiji?
0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Fiji?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Fiji rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Chile ranks 99th and Fiji ranks 101st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Fiji: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/chile/fiji/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/chile/fiji/">Chile vs Fiji: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.