Chad vs Samoa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Chad
1.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
70th
Samoa rank
67th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Chad
  • Samoa
0123196119922023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 70th and Samoa ranks 67th of 167 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1175 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6835 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1970s 0.1328 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1980s 0.2741 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9977 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7236 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 0.4669 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9893 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2000s 0.771 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 1.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Chad or Samoa?
Samoa, at 2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Chad and Samoa?
0.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Samoa?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Samoa rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Chad ranks 70th and Samoa ranks 67th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Samoa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/chad/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/chad/samoa/">Chad vs Samoa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.