Barbados vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Barbados
1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
1.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
74th
Turkmenistan rank
73rd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Barbados
  • Turkmenistan
0246810196119922023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 1.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 74th and Turkmenistan ranks 73rd of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Turkmenistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 7.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4912 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 3.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.974 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Barbados or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 1.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Barbados and Turkmenistan?
0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Turkmenistan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Barbados ranks 74th and Turkmenistan ranks 73rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/barbados/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/barbados/turkmenistan/">Barbados vs Turkmenistan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.