Barbados vs Kenya: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Barbados
1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya
1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
74th
Kenya rank
71st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Barbados
  • Kenya
0246810196119922023

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 74th and Kenya ranks 71st of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Kenya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 3.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 3.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 3.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 8.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 3.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kenya
2020s 1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Barbados or Kenya?
Kenya, at 1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Barbados and Kenya?
0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Kenya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Kenya rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Barbados ranks 74th and Kenya ranks 71st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Kenya: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/barbados/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/barbados/kenya/">Barbados vs Kenya: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.