Austria vs Guatemala: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Austria
11.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Guatemala
13.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
12th
Guatemala rank
9th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Austria
  • Guatemala
2.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 13.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 11.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Austria, a difference of 1.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Austria's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 12th and Guatemala ranks 9th of 167 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 7.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
1970s 9.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
1980s 11.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
1990s 11.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
2000s 11.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
2010s 11.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Austria or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 13.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 11.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Austria as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Austria and Guatemala?
1.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Guatemala?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Austria and Guatemala rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Austria ranks 12th and Guatemala ranks 9th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Guatemala: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/austria/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/austria/guatemala/">Austria vs Guatemala: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.