Australia vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Australia
1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Australia rank
89th
Finland rank
90th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Australia
  • Finland
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Australia ranks 89th and Finland ranks 90th of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7643 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.8716 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6618 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.8286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8645 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
1990s 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4605 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0806 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Australia or Finland?
Australia, at 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Australia and Finland?
0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Finland?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Australia and Finland rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Australia ranks 89th and Finland ranks 90th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/australia/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/australia/finland/">Australia vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.