Finland vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Finland
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Suriname
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Finland rank
110th
Suriname rank
111th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Finland
  • Suriname
0000196119922024

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Suriname, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 110th and Suriname ranks 111th of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Finland
1970s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Finland
1980s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Finland
1990s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Suriname
2000s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Suriname
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Finland or Suriname?
Finland, at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Suriname as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Finland and Suriname?
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Suriname?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Finland and Suriname rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Finland ranks 110th and Suriname ranks 111th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-5/finland/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-5/finland/suriname/">Finland vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 8,811 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.