Equatorial Guinea vs Qatar: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Equatorial Guinea
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Qatar
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
155th
Qatar rank
158th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Qatar
00000196219932024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Qatar, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 10.9 times Qatar's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th and Qatar ranks 158th of 166 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Qatar Difference Ahead
1970s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Equatorial Guinea or Qatar?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Qatar as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Equatorial Guinea and Qatar?
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Qatar?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Qatar rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th and Qatar ranks 158th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Qatar: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-5/equatorial-guinea/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-5/equatorial-guinea/qatar/">Equatorial Guinea vs Qatar: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 8,811 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.