Mauritius vs Montenegro: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Mauritius
0 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Montenegro
0 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Mauritius rank
162nd
Montenegro rank
161st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Mauritius
  • Montenegro
00.010.020.03196119922024

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per person against 0 1000 Int$ per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 2.0 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Mauritius ranks 162nd and Montenegro ranks 161st of 167 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0209 1000 Int$ per person 0.0206 1000 Int$ per person Montenegro
2010s 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person Montenegro
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Mauritius or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 0 1000 Int$ per person against 0 1000 Int$ per person in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Mauritius and Montenegro?
0 1000 Int$ per person, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Montenegro?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Montenegro rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Mauritius ranks 162nd and Montenegro ranks 161st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Montenegro: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/mauritius/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/mauritius/montenegro/">Mauritius vs Montenegro: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.