Malta vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Malta
0.0103 1000 Int$ per person
in 2017
Suriname
0.0101 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Malta rank
108th
Suriname rank
109th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Malta
  • Suriname
00.010.020.03196119922024

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0103 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0101 1000 Int$ per person in Suriname, a difference of 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 108th and Suriname ranks 109th of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0092 1000 Int$ per person 0.0117 1000 Int$ per person 0.0025 1000 Int$ per person Suriname
1970s 0.0148 1000 Int$ per person 0.0103 1000 Int$ per person 0.0045 1000 Int$ per person Malta
1980s 0.0177 1000 Int$ per person 0.0155 1000 Int$ per person 0.0023 1000 Int$ per person Malta
1990s 0.0186 1000 Int$ per person 0.0217 1000 Int$ per person 0.0031 1000 Int$ per person Suriname
2000s 0.0156 1000 Int$ per person 0.014 1000 Int$ per person 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person Malta
2010s 0.0114 1000 Int$ per person 0.0134 1000 Int$ per person 0.0021 1000 Int$ per person Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Malta or Suriname?
Malta, at 0.0103 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0101 1000 Int$ per person in Suriname as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Malta and Suriname?
0.0002 1000 Int$ per person, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Suriname?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Malta and Suriname rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Malta ranks 108th and Suriname ranks 109th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/malta/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/malta/suriname/">Malta vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.