Malaysia vs Mozambique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Malaysia
0.003 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Mozambique
0.0026 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Malaysia rank
145th
Mozambique rank
146th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Malaysia
  • Mozambique
00.0050.010.015196119922024

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.003 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0026 1000 Int$ per person in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mozambique ahead.

Malaysia ranks 145th and Mozambique ranks 146th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0029 1000 Int$ per person 0.0159 1000 Int$ per person 0.013 1000 Int$ per person Mozambique
1970s 0.0024 1000 Int$ per person 0.0151 1000 Int$ per person 0.0127 1000 Int$ per person Mozambique
1980s 0.0023 1000 Int$ per person 0.0117 1000 Int$ per person 0.0094 1000 Int$ per person Mozambique
1990s 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person 0.0039 1000 Int$ per person 0.0027 1000 Int$ per person Mozambique
2000s 0.001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person Mozambique
2010s 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person 0.0019 1000 Int$ per person 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person Mozambique
2020s 0.0031 1000 Int$ per person 0.0025 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Malaysia or Mozambique?
Malaysia, at 0.003 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0026 1000 Int$ per person in Mozambique as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Malaysia and Mozambique?
0.0004 1000 Int$ per person, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Mozambique?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Malaysia and Mozambique rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Malaysia ranks 145th and Mozambique ranks 146th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Mozambique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/malaysia/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/malaysia/mozambique/">Malaysia vs Mozambique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.