Liberia vs Saudi Arabia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Liberia
0.0007 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
0.0018 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Liberia rank
154th
Saudi Arabia rank
151st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Liberia
  • Saudi Arabia
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922024

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.0018 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person in Liberia, a difference of 0.0011 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 2.4 times Liberia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Liberia ranks 154th and Saudi Arabia ranks 151st of 167 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person 0.0041 1000 Int$ per person 0.0029 1000 Int$ per person Saudi Arabia
1970s 0.0013 1000 Int$ per person 0.0032 1000 Int$ per person 0.0019 1000 Int$ per person Saudi Arabia
1980s 0.0013 1000 Int$ per person 0.0051 1000 Int$ per person 0.0037 1000 Int$ per person Saudi Arabia
1990s 0.0014 1000 Int$ per person 0.0069 1000 Int$ per person 0.0055 1000 Int$ per person Saudi Arabia
2000s 0.001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0037 1000 Int$ per person 0.0027 1000 Int$ per person Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0053 1000 Int$ per person 0.0044 1000 Int$ per person Saudi Arabia
2020s 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person 0.0014 1000 Int$ per person 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Liberia or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0.0018 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person in Liberia as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Liberia and Saudi Arabia?
0.0011 1000 Int$ per person, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Saudi Arabia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Liberia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Liberia ranks 154th and Saudi Arabia ranks 151st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Saudi Arabia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/liberia/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/liberia/saudi-arabia/">Liberia vs Saudi Arabia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.