Guinea-Bissau vs Malawi: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Guinea-Bissau
0.0156 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Malawi
0.0146 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
88th
Malawi rank
90th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Malawi
0.0050.010.0150.02196119922024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0156 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0146 1000 Int$ per person in Malawi, a difference of 0.001 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 88th and Malawi ranks 90th of 167 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0135 1000 Int$ per person 0.0058 1000 Int$ per person 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person Guinea-Bissau
1970s 0.0132 1000 Int$ per person 0.0073 1000 Int$ per person 0.006 1000 Int$ per person Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.0124 1000 Int$ per person 0.0087 1000 Int$ per person 0.0038 1000 Int$ per person Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.0153 1000 Int$ per person 0.0063 1000 Int$ per person 0.0089 1000 Int$ per person Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0165 1000 Int$ per person 0.0079 1000 Int$ per person 0.0086 1000 Int$ per person Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0165 1000 Int$ per person 0.0105 1000 Int$ per person 0.006 1000 Int$ per person Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.016 1000 Int$ per person 0.0136 1000 Int$ per person 0.0025 1000 Int$ per person Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Guinea-Bissau or Malawi?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0156 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0146 1000 Int$ per person in Malawi as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Guinea-Bissau and Malawi?
0.001 1000 Int$ per person, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Malawi?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Malawi rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 88th and Malawi ranks 90th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Malawi: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/guinea-bissau/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/guinea-bissau/malawi/">Guinea-Bissau vs Malawi: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.